Anne Quaranto


I am a graduate student in philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin. I specialize in social and political issues in the philosophy of language. My research on dog whistles, coded speech, propaganda, and slurs focuses on how communicated content is shaped by temporally extended and sociopolitically structured linguistic practices.

More recently, I'm also a (very) amateur potter—perhaps one of the few human practices older than philosophy.

You can find my CV here.


No one denies that language is a social practice, but most analytic philosophy of language abstracts away from the sociopolitical aspects of language, or goes even further to treat language primarily as an abstract, formal entity. What happens if we prioritize the social, political, practical elements of linguistic communication?

I argue this shift in focus yields productive challenges for the notion of what is said and for our assumptions about what it's possible for a speaker to say. I also argue that we should shift our focus in this way, because to fully understand what and how speakers can communicate, we'll need to theorize about linguistic communities and their practices, rather than solely about individual speakers and their communicative intentions.

Dog whistles, propaganda, and reclaimed slurs are useful test cases for this shift in focus, because they don't fit the standard mold of true, relevant assertions made by one cooperative, rational speaker to one cooperative, rational hearer. My work thus seeks not only to understand these phenomena in their own right, but also to identify what these phenomena can teach us about how we should study communication and speech more broadly.

Work in Progress

Titles redacted. Drafts are available on request.

  • A paper on dog whistles and other coded speech

  • A paper on reclaiming slurs

  • A paper on competing accounts of practices

  • A paper on Wittgenstein's rule-following paradox

The Stand in the Schoolhouse Door — June 11, 1963
While physically preventing the University of Alabama's first-ever Black students from entering a university building, Alabama Governor George Wallace declaims on national TV against violations of "states' rights."
Photo by Warren K. Leffler, U.S. News & World Report Magazine.

Queer Nation activists march in New York City — 1990
At a time when "queer" is used almost exclusively as a homophobic slur, members of Queer Nation set out to reclaim the term, subversively using "queer" at Gay Pride events and during protests and demonstrations.
Photo by Ellen Neipris.


Anne Quaranto and Jason Stanley, “Propaganda,” in The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language, ed. Justin Khoo and Rachel Sterken (Routledge, 2021), 125–46.

Penultimate draft available here.

Abstract: This chapter provides a high-level introduction to the topic of propaganda. We survey a number of the most influential accounts of propaganda, from the earliest institutional studies in the 1920s to contemporary academic work. We propose that these accounts, as well as the various examples of propaganda which we discuss, all converge around a key feature: persuasion which bypasses audiences’ rational faculties. In practice, propaganda can take different forms, serve various interests, and produce a variety of effects. Propaganda can aim to affect not only audiences’ beliefs and attitudes, but also their emotions and moods, and in turn how audiences subsequently reason or act. While propaganda is often thought of as false or misinformation, it can instead involve framing effects (“The war on drugs”), covert messaging (“There are Muslims among us”), emotionally charged slogans (“Make America Great Again”), or myths (“The American dream”). These forms of propaganda mislead audiences, not by introducing false information, but by making some beliefs and values, rather than others, salient. In fact, propaganda can even employ straightforwardly true claims (again, as in “There are Muslims among us”) and seemingly objective bureaucratic reports (“Crime has risen 4.2%”). To understand how these and other mechanisms enable propaganda to persuade by arational means, further study is needed. To that end, throughout the chapter we identify a number of places where the study of meaning and communication can help elucidate propaganda, as well as the places where propaganda issues challenges for the study of meaning.


February 2022:
Commentary on “Power and Linguistic Context,” Gretchen Ellefson (Southern Utah University), APA Central Division Meeting (Chicago, IL).

September 2021:
“How to take Slurs back from Bigots”, UT Austin Graduate Colloquium.

January 2021:
"Propaganda" (with
Jason Stanley), Philosophy of Propaganda Research Group (University of Barcelona)

October 2020:
“Dog Whistles, Covertly Coded Speech, and the Linguistic Practices that Enable Them”, Words Workshop (University of Pittsburgh)



Spring 2021: Human Nature (syllabus)

Spring 2020: Introduction to Philosophy (syllabus)


Fall 2021: Philosophy of Race and Gender (upper division)

Summer 2021: Contemporary Moral Problems

Summer 2020: Philosophy of Law (upper division)

Fall 2019: Problems of Knowledge and Valuation (Plan II Honors Program)

Spring 2019: Philosophy and Literature

Fall 2018: Introduction to Philosophy

Summer 2018: Knowledge and Reality

Spring 2018: Introduction to Logic

Fall 2017: Medicine, Ethics, and Society (upper division)

Spring 2017: Problems of Knowledge and Valuation (Plan II Honors Program)

Fall 2016: Mind and Body


Anne Quaranto

Department of Philosophy

The University of Texas at Austin

2210 Speedway, Stop C3500

WAG 417

Austin, TX 78712-1737